- With CBDC, fintechs will be able to provide services w/o banks
- Wholesale vs Retail CBDC
- Proposed Retail CBDC Projects
- API implementation for BC-based CBDC
Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) gains interest across the Globe.
Central Banks (CB) are conducting research and embarking on Proof Of Concept
With CBDC, fintechs will be able to provide services w/o banks
TODAY: Any fintech provides new services on top of the existing banking infrastructure.
Retail CBDC opens opportunities to extend access to digital central bank money =>
TOMORROW: fintechs will be able to provide services without banks.
Qplatform works today in current paradigm, facilitating Bank-to-Fintech integrations. Meanwhile we consider the tomorrow option as a great market opportunity for us, that’s why our IT strategy is built with appropriate technologies in mind.
Wholesale vs Retail CBDC
Limited to commercial banks, clearing institutions and other entities that traditionally have access to CB reserves
Has a larger user base, can involve corporates, small businesses and individuals. Refers to those who currently do not have access to central bank money
Last step in Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) technical solutions evolution, which has 50-year history and is been modernized every few decades
Young from tech point, currently does not exist in production. However, CBs across the world are beginning to commit resources towards implementing it
Atomic Delivery: Bank of Canada: Project Jasper Phase 3
Cross-border payments: Bank of Thailand: Project Inthanon Phase3
Efficient complex payments workflows: Project Urbin - blockchain improves core features of RTGS systems: reducing gridlock, enhancing flexibility, giving more control and real time visibility of payments netting network-wide to banks
The Gap between CB innovation on wholesale lvl and fintech innovation on retail lvl will soon narrow
Proposed Retail CBDC Projects
Within single currency zone
Private sector payments innovation focuses on the front end system - which faces users directly, including new ways of payment initiating (mobile/contactless) and overlay systems which wrap existing settlement systems and most of an existing framework around fresh interfaces.
Over the past decade, we see increasing number of nations have implemented faster or real-time payments systems:
- UK: Faster payments
- India: IMPS
- Australia: NPP
- Russia: Quick Payments System
- total: 54 countries
- +14 countries in 2019
Yet these solutions provide new digital rails for payments within a currency zone, services are offered via consumer’s bank accounts, and txs are settled inter-bank.
Worth mentioning here, WeChat and Alipay in China. These are full-stack but closed-loop payments systems: both payer and payee live in the same system, no settlement across separate systems takes place. It cannot be a global solution because of: coordination challenge, risk concentration which comes as the cost of a lack of interoperability.
Blockchain-based CBDC solution
Cryptocurrency concept with stable coins looks more promising here.
Among others, proper CBDC solution should implement:
- distributed custody and p2p transfers,
- integration with a larger Ecosystem,
- improved security and resilience by removing honey pots of data and centralized weak points
All these features are natural attributes of blockchain-based systems.
This represents the paradigm shift from account-based transfer of value to storing and transferring of value on blockchain.
- the digital storage and transfer of value,
- Interoperability between different asset types,
- global integrity of the system in which CBDC exists,
- security improvement over centralized payments systems.
While some (public) blockchains have known drawbacks:
- Data privacy,
- Probabilistic settlement.
According to R3 consortium, Corda blockchain protocol overcomes all of them:
- built on requirements for regulated enterprises,
- creates environment that adheres to regulatory standarts,
- has unique p2p design: data is only shared with relevant parties,
- identity present by default beginning as it’s a private chain,
- scalability enhanced with uncoupled tx run in parallel and p2p data distribution techniques,
- settlement finality guaranteed by Corda’s consensus model.
To prove this in action, R3 conducted an experiment with DLT for domestic network together with the Bank of Canada: Project Jasper. Among its conclusions, it was found that DLTs alowing integration with financial market infrastructure ecosystem along with settlement finality, privacy and scalability, such as Corda, could run it better than existing proof-of-work blockchains like Ethereum, still being more cost-effective.
API implementation for BC-based CBDC
While tokenized CBDC brings the opportunity to extend access to central bank money, not all participants will have access to (or want to be the custodian of) their CBDC with access to CB’s balance sheets.
For those who won’t, the mechanism of API accounts comes into play.
It is described in the generalized implementation option for CBDC proposed by R3. A user will communicate with a chain node through an API:
A node can be held by organizations of two tiers:
Tier-1: priviledged wholesale financial institutions that can interact with central bank and hold and transfer tokens themselves.
Tier-2: retail users (fintechs), that can interact with tier-1 and transfer tokens between themselves.
Top-level structure scheme of account-based CBDC looks like this one:
With vast experience in developing financial services integrations, Qplatform is looking forward to build and provide CBDC-access API on its marketplace to allow seamless plug-in for non-ledger participants.